skip to Main Content

FILL OUT ORDER NOW FORM

MAKE A PAYMENT

WRITER BEGINS WORKING ON ORDER

QUALITY CONTROL CHECK

DOWNLOAD COMPLETED ORDER

Discuss an offender’s limited privacy right in his or her housing assignment as authorized by the Court of Appeals

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution ensures that citizens have the right “to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures.” Furthermore, it ensures citizens that “no warrants shall be issued, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” (LII, n.d.)
However, as previously noted, incarcerated individuals have diminished constitutional rights. As such, inmates do not enjoy the same constitutionally protected rights to privacy. Despite the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals originally determining that inmates have limited privacy rights in their cell assignments, in Hudson v. Palmer (1984), the Supreme Court details why incarcerated persons have no expectation of privacy within their cells or property. In 2012, Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders re-affirmed that in the balancing of competing interests (an offender’s individual right to privacy versus a society’s need for security), the correctional institution’s need to promote a secure environment justifies a policy of routine or arbitrary strip searches. Furthermore, Bell v. Wolfish (1979) holds that body cavity searches by correctional staff are neither unreasonable nor unconstitutional.
Referencing at least 3 credible sources and using proper APA format and guidelines, submit a 4–5-page paper that addresses the following:
Summarizes the facts of Hudson v. Palmer
Discuss an offender’s limited privacy right in his or her housing assignment as authorized by the Court of Appeals, including the state’s objection to the Court of Appeals decision that allowed offenders to have a limited privacy right. (Hint: The Court of Appeals wanted to determine the purpose of the cell search.)
Discuss the Supreme Court’s decision in Hudson v. Palmer in light of the Fourth Amendment.
Specifically, discuss the 2 interests in balance when determining whether an expectation of privacy is legitimate or reasonable.
Discuss whether a prisoner’s expectation of privacy in his or her prison cell is the kind of expectation that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable.
Summarize the facts of Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders.
Summarize the facts of Bell v. Wolfish.
Discuss at least 5 of the penological determinants for random and nonrandom searches of offender housing units, both with and without justification.
References
Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 (1979).
Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, 566 U.S. 318 (2012).
Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517 (1984).
Legal Information Institute (LII). (n.d.). Amendment IV. Cornell Law School. https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fourth_amendment
Please submit your assignment.
Your assignment will be graded in accordance with the following criteria. View the grading rubric.
Assignment Reminders:
Please submit your assignment.
Make sure you submit this assignment by the listed due date. Late deductions will apply for this assignment. Please refer to the Late Submission of Assignment policy.
If you need assistance, please view the Troubleshooting tips.
Resave in the proper format per the Assignment Detail instructions, and resubmit.
Submit with a different Web browser.
Submit from a different computer.
Call Technical Support at 877-221-5800, Menu Option 2. They are open 24/7.
If you are still having difficulties after trying steps 1-4, please contact your course instructor.

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

WHAT'S INCLUDED IN OUR ESSAY WRITING SERVICES

300 WORDS PER PAGE

To give you the best value for your money, we use a standard 300 words per page – up to 50 more words per page than other essay writing companies!

PLAGIARISM-FREE

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism. All assignments go through plagiarism-detection software tools via a secure website before they’re sent to you.

FREE REVISIONS POLICY

If you want any changes made, it’s not a problem! Our comprehensive free revisions policy allows you to request a revision within (5) days at no extra charge.

24/7 SUPPORT

We have a team of friendly, helpful customer support staff who work around the clock, and are available to answer your questions or concerns 24/7, day or night.

Customer Testimonials